What
is a Wild Bison? The Biological Definition
For Montana bison, there are
two definitions of wildness: a legal definition and a biological
definition. Only the latter is considered here.
|
To a biologist,
the opposite of “wild” is “domestic”.
The vast majority of bison are being domesticated as legally defined
livestock in private commercial herds. In contrast, only about
2000 plains bison exist in conservation herds south of Canada.
|
Across America, the major
threat to persistence of wild bison is domestication.
|
But the process of domestication occurs in our conservation herds
as well. Valuable wild characteristics of bison are being eliminated
(Bailey 2013). Wild plains bison may not endure as our heritage
to future generations.
If wild bison are to prevail as a public trust resource, a simple
definition – with a clear explanation – is necessary.
Definition: A wild
bison herd is subjected to a preponderance of natural selection.
For many readers, this simple definition will be unsatisfactory.
It simply substitutes “natural” for “wild”,
adding little clarification. Hence, the complexities of natural
selection must be addressed to provide real meaning. Warning:
for many readers this will require serious concentration on a
complex subject. It’s complicated, but it’s very,
very important for the future of wild bison.
Natural Selection
Revises Bison Genomes with Each New Generation
|
Natural selection has been a major driver in the evolution that
produced all our wildlife, including all their unique and valuable
characteristics. Over many generations, whole new species have
developed.
But evolution proceeds slowly. At the process level, evolution
occurs with each new generation of animals. Evolution includes
every change, however small, in the genetic constitution of a
population between generations. These changes may go unnoticed,
but in time they accumulate and threaten the wild values of bison.
|
We cannot leave bison to
future generations of us. Bison die, but their genes, in their
many changing combinations, persist. These combinations determine
the qualities of succeeding populations of bison. Thus, if we
are to consider our legacy to future generations, we must become
aware of the complexities of population genetics. It is an ethical
mandate of conservation biology.
|
Our heritage to the future will be the wildness of bison genomes.
A genome is all the different forms of genes (alleles) and their
very many combinations, existing across all the animals within
a herd.
Bison Genomes Are
Incredibly Diverse and Complex
A gene is the heritable unit of DNA at a location on a chromosome.
A human chromosome, for example, has thousands of genes, and there
are 23 chromosomes. But many genes exist in different forms (alleles),
spread across the animals in a population. A population, therefore,
may have many, many thousands of alleles, with most alleles having
somewhat different effects upon the host animals. Moreover, most
animal characteristics depend upon effects of combinations of
genes working together. Thus, a population has many, many, many
thousands of different allele combinations, dispersed across its
animals. Some combinations are more beneficial for survival and
reproduction of their host animals; other combinations are less
beneficial and some are downright deleterious. Each animal has
some mix of these. And with reproduction and each succeeding generation
of bison, the alleles and their combinations are reorganized into
a new genome.
Natural Selection
Is an Inefficient Process
Natural selection cannot operate at the level of alleles. It must
favor those animals with the “best” available overall
mixtures of gene combinations for reproduction and survival in
a current environment. Thus, “poor” alleles survive
across generations mostly because some happen to exist with combinations
of “good” alleles in some of the animals.
|
As a result, natural selection is an inefficient and slow process.
It is also a conservative process that retains alleles less suited
to a current environment. Such alleles may become useful and favored
in a new or changed environment. Most important for this discussion,
is that – as an inefficient process – natural selection
is easily weakened and replaced, especially in small bison populations.
|
Natural selection is easily
weakened and replaced, especially in small bison populations.
Inbreeding, artificial selection and genetic drift replace and
weaken natural selection.
|
Opponents of Natural Selection
Three processes weaken or replace natural selection in bison herds.
They are inbreeding, artificial selection and a random process
called genetic drift.
Inbreeding results from reproduction by closely
related animals. Inbred offspring have more pairs of recessive
deleterious alleles than do outbred offspring. (Such alleles are
not expressed in the host animal when they are paired with different
“dominant” alleles.)
Thus, inbred animals have a genetic burden
that limits their survival and reproduction. This removes animals
from much exposure to natural selection, weakening the ability
of natural selection to favor, at the population level, many alleles
that would be beneficial in the environment. Essentially, inbreeding
diminishes the number of animals available to natural selection.
|
Inbreeding is a significant issue for small bison herds, especially
those with few breeding-age males relative to the number of females.
|
Inbreeding weakens the ability
of natural selection to favor beneficial alleles in the population.
|
Artificial selection occurs when human decisions or human-created
environments determine the survival and reproduction of individual
animals. It is most expressed when there is selective culling
to control animal characteristics and/or herd size.
|
However, many human activities – often called wildlife management
– contribute to artificial selection. For examples: predator
control eliminates selection for animals with the best gene combinations
for predator detection, predator defense, seeking habitat security,
and predator escape. Population control, perhaps with winter feeding,
limits herd size and removes much of the selection for animals
best suited in terms of habitat selection, competitiveness, foraging
proficiency and energy efficiency, for surviving in occasional
severe winters. Vaccinations eliminate selection for animals with
the best disease-resistance.
|
Artificial selection replaces
much of natural selection in most bison herds. Artificially
selected bison herds will become ever-more dependent upon human
support and management to survive and reproduce efficiently,
especially in a wild environment. Bison will become a domesticated
species.
|
Genetic drift occurs when random processes determine
which animals survive and reproduce, and which alleles are passed
to offspring. Some drift is obligatory, as it occurs when chromosomes
are split to form every sperm or ovum. In bison, half the chromosomes
and their alleles are, essentially, discarded at random as only
one ovum and one sperm become successful in forming one calf per
year. Drift weakens natural selection. After selection has favored
survival of an animal with its unique allele combinations, half
the alleles are discarded in producing a calf!
|
Genetic drift negatively
affects a herd genome by diminishing allelic diversity, by allowing
deleterious alleles to persist, and by dismantling the adapted
wild genome.
|
As an inefficient process, natural selection works best with large
populations. In contrast, drift affects half the herd genome,
no matter the herd size. Thus, its influence upon herd evolution
is more preponderant over natural selection in smaller herds.
Drift has three negative effects upon a population:
|
Loss of alleles.
Randomness dictates that the proportion of animals carrying a
given allele will increase or decrease, due to chance, with each
year’s calf crop. Over time, the frequency of an allele
may increase, or it may decrease, consistently across some consecutive
years. (As every poker player has good and bad streaks of luck!)
With time, some alleles will experience too many consecutive “bad”
years and decrease to zero. They go extinct in the herd. One study
estimates that a herd of 2000-3000 bison will lose 5 percent of
its alleles each 100 years. Herd genetic diversity declines and
the ability of the herd to adapt, genetically, to future changes
in the environment is diminished. |
It cannot be good if the
composition and organization of a herd’s genome is drifting
at random. Yet, negative effects of genetic drift are commonly
ignored in wildlife management.
|
Persistence of deleterious alleles. To the extent that natural
selection is weakened by drift, alleles that negatively affect
survival and reproduction are less promptly diminished or removed
from a population through natural selection. Deleterious alleles
can persist when combined with a preponderance of valuable alleles.
Dismantling the wild genome. In a large wild bison population,
with effective natural selection, we expect that a large proportion
of the animals will have a large proportion of allele combinations
that favor survival and reproduction in the wild environment.
This organization of the herd genome is maintained with continued
natural selection. When natural selection is weakened by random
drift (and/or replaced by artificial selection), the wild herd
genome is dismantled and disorganized. It becomes less effective,
less efficient, for operating in the wild environment.
Wild Bison and Their
Habitat Requirements
|
With the above
as context, wild bison are those living with a preponderance of
natural selection. For effective natural selection, bison must
live in a large herd and roam over a large, diverse landscape
that presents the diversity of opportunities and challenges that
constitute the full array of natural selection.
|
A large, diverse habitat
is required to provide the full array of natural selection for
bison.
|
In contrast, most plains bison today are in small herds living
in small habitats. They are subjected to much artificial selection,
augmented by a preponderant genetic drift, dismantling the wild
genomes. Gradual domestication is inevitable.
For retention of wildness, this Coalition promotes at least 1000
bison on at least 100 square miles of diverse, quality bison habitat.
This would allow expression and maintenance of wild characteristics
of bison, including their most basic characteristic of great mobility.
The Perplexity
of Wildness
Wildness is much more than a mere romantic notion. It is a legacy
of living and dying that occurred in a species’ extensive
past. It is the complex, genetically organized, accumulation
of diversity and adaptedness that fits a species to its environment.
It has provided animals that are efficient, self-sustaining,
and a valuable human resource.
Wildness is resilient, yet can be eliminated – rapidly
in small populations; slowly and imperceptibly in larger herds.
It is happening with many species and will continue until the
profession of wildlife management recognizes and addresses the
issue. The definition and understanding of wildness is necessary
to realize how the present array of bison herds in Montana is
not adequate for retaining wild bison.
Aside from all this, we know wildness when we recognize the
awe, allure and adventure of the wild. We must not deny these
feelings, lest we diminish wild bison and ourselves. And the
science of wildness, alluded to here, only adds to that awe,
allure and adventure.
Jim Bailey, 2018
Bailey, J. A. 2013. American Plains Bison:
Rewilding an Icon. Sweetgrass Books, Helena, Montana. 238pp.
|
Site designed and maintained
by Kathryn QannaYahu Kern |